Drake Software blog for tax pros, covering tax, IRS news, and more

TIGTA Finds Employment Tax Noncompliance Growing

An evaluation by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) shows that the Internal Revenue Service isn’t managing to keep up with the growing number of employers who knowingly fail to account for and deposit their employment taxes.

Noncompliance in this sector is a serious crime – employment tax embezzlement is a felony, punishable by up to five years in prison.

TIGTA’s evaluation found that as of December 2015, 1.4 million employers owed nearly $46 billion in unpaid employment taxes, interest and penalties. Those numbers, TIGTA found, are likely to grow.

“Employment tax embezzlement is an especially egregious crime because the employer or payroll service provider violates their fiduciary responsibility to remit the taxes on behalf of their employees,” said J. Russell George, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.  “Furthermore, the programs funded by employment taxes provide essential benefits to many citizens,” he added.

TIGTA says the number of employers with 20 or more quarters of delinquent employment taxes is steadily growing. According to a Governmental Accountability Office report, at the end of FY 1998 about 5,000 employers had 20 or more quarters of employment tax debt; by FY 2007, the number had grown to over 10,000. By December 2015, according to IRS records, there were almost 17,000 employers with 20 or more quarters of employment tax debt— thereby more than tripling in the 17-year period.

Despite the felony penalty for willful failure to pay employment tax, fewer than 100 criminal convictions are handed down per year. In many of the unprosecuted cases, the IRS sought civil penalties such as liens and the TFRP rather than criminal charges.

Employers essentially hold their workers’ withheld employment taxes in trust before sending them to the IRS. So one of the tools at the IRS’ disposal in such cases is the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (TFRP); it’s a civil enforcement tool that can be used in egregious cases to discourage employers from continued nonpayment of employment tax.

The loss of revenue officers due to budget cuts has further hurt enforcement efforts.

In fiscal year 2015, the IRS assessed the TFRP against some 27,000 employers – but that was 38 percent fewer than just five years before because of diminished officer resources, TIGTA found.

The Inspector General’s report makes it clear that their auditors understand the impact that protracted budget cuts have had on the enforcement process. But the recommendation is to forward the most blatant cases to the Criminal Investigation (CI) section of the IRS.

“Our purpose in the recommendation is to clarify that deceit is not required for a conviction under I.R.C. § 7202,” the report states. “For example, the statute does not require that a taxpayer convert withheld trust fund taxes for personal use. In addition, there are numerous egregious cases available that should be considered for investigation that are not even referred to CI or considered. This includes cases with over $1 million and individuals involved with 10 or more companies that failed to provide the money to IRS that was being held “in trust” for the Federal government.”

The IRS agreed with TIGTA’s recommendation to adopt a more focused strategy on collection of egregious employment. But the IRS says their limited resources and other factors don’t allow for all the cases to be assigned to the Criminal Investigations Division.

Bob Williams

Forget genes; I’ve got words in my DNA. Communication has been part of who I am nearly all my life. From a long career in radio news to another one in newspapers – and a University of Georgia journalism degree sandwiched between the two – language has been my life. I’ve also been fortunate to have learned the tax business from the ground up here at Drake, starting with 1040.com online forms some years ago before moving on to work on the Web. In all things tax-ish, we aim to give you tools you can use.

comments powered by Disqus